Home
Law
High School

In 1972, U.S. courts ruled that the members of the National Socialist (NAZI) Party could not be banned from marching in a largely Jewish neighborhood of Chicago. Many of the residents of this neighborhood were Holocaust Survivors, to whom seeing this march would be horribly painful. On what understanding of the right of peaceful assembly might the court have made this ruling?1.There were fewer Holocaust survivors than National Socialists, so the rule of the majority came into play.2.The National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.3.The NAZI point of view was rejected by society as a whole, so they could not march in this Jewish area, but must march elsewhere.4.It would be okay for them to march as long as they didn’t wear NAZI uniforms, which might promote violence.

See Answers (1)

Accepted Answer

The correct answer choice is (2). The court's ruling was based on the understanding that the National Socialists had the right to assemble peacefully and march, despite how unpopular their views might be.We all have the right to assemble peacefully and to form association with others. We have the right to form or to join trade unions in the act of protecting our interests.If any restrictions are placed on this right, then they are according to the law and necessary in the interest of national security and public order. The restrictions can be placed for the prevention of crime or mishap, for the protection of freedom of others and for maintaining law and order situation in the area.To know more about right to assemble herehttps://brainly.com/question/2141285#SPJ1