the constitution does not specifically state that a defendant has the right to an impartial judge. which supreme court case ruled this was a right for all defendants?

Tumey v. Ohio Supreme Court case ruled this was a right for all defendantsTumey v. Ohio was a 1927 case heard by the United States Supreme Court. The court overturned an Ohio legislation that deprived persons of their constitutionally provided right to due process by monetarily rewarding public officials who successfully prosecuted Prohibition cases.The Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendants’ rights, including the right to a speedy public trial, the right to counsel, an unbiased jury, and the right to know who their accusers are and the nature of the allegations and evidence against them. It has been most prominently challenged in a number of instances concerning terrorism. Still, it appears far more frequently in situations involving (for example) jury selection or witness protection, including victims of sexual offenses as well as witnesses in need of reprisal protection.For more information on Defendants’ rights, visit : https://brainly.com/question/16223801#SPJ4