When reading about the history of science, you often learn about individual people and the amazing things they discovered or invented. However, when learning about experiments from long ago, you might not agree with the methods used at the time. If scientists repeated the experiments today, they would probably make some changes in how they are carried out.
Priestley’s experiments, for example, were a remarkable breakthrough in the understanding of photosynthesis. He helped show an important relationship between plants and animals. However, his experiments resulted in the death of a lot of mice.
Answer one of the following prompts to begin your discussion:
Do you think that the results of Priestley’s experiments were important enough to make it okay that so many mice were killed in his experiments? Why or why not?
If you could do the experiment again, how would you design it so that you could reach the same conclusions without harming any animals?

Yes i do think young manyou are really smart stay focused and workout

Photosynthesis sustains aerobic life on Earth, and Joseph Priestley first demonstrated this in the 18th-century Bellger experiment with mice and mint plants. To demonstrate the fragility of life on Earth, Priestley's experiment was recreated by placing humans in a modern-day bell his jar.After 48 hours, the oxygen concentration in the reservoir had risen to 18.1% of his, and the subject's hypoxemia was alleviated (arterial blood oxygen saturation increased from his 86% at the beginning of the experiment to his increased to 99%). Carbon dioxide levels increased up to 0.66% during testing.This simple but unique experiment highlights the importance of plants in Earth's ecosystems by demonstrating our dependence on restoring and maintaining oxygen levels to support aerobic metabolism. increase. Without plants in sealed enclosures, oxygen levels would have dropped and carbon dioxide levels would have risen to levels unsustainable for human life.To learn more about Priestley’s experiments,https://brainly.com/question/16580238